Hello, you are welcome to view the Radio Mute music forum as our guest. If you wish to participate, you will have to register to become one of our members. Radio Mute is an all inclusive music forum which strives to include every topic related to music. If you choose to participate, new forums and features will open up to you; including an option of having 3 songs uploaded and shown in your posts for free, community section with general chat and more.

User Name 
Password

Search 
 at 


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2002, 08:56 PM   #1
Jaypanda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: canada.
why does everyone have to use reason.

although it is a fun program of super synth doom and does include sequencers and trackers galore. it's just not the real thing. i'm finding that it's a great way to become familiar with synths, drum machines and stuff if you're not...but i find it a bit cheap when you start revolving all your music production around a pc program. anyone care to add, agree, disagree?
keep in mind i'm not slammin the program...just pointin out that it is just a program. i'd really like to see a live band get up on stage with a pc and start using reason. that just isn't right.
__________________
jay.
[offline]   Quote  
Old 10-23-2002, 07:44 PM   #2
Jaypanda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: canada.
both actually. it's like rebirth. good learning tools. but people shouldn't revolve their music making career around them. i mean...a damn monkey could pull out music on those programs...not so much reason...but you get the point.
__________________
jay.
[offline]   Quote  
Old 10-28-2002, 06:58 PM   #3
Forte
Blue... .
 
Forte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South FLA
Is this a software vs hardware argument? If so, then it really depends on what you want to do.
Sure, for live performances, hardware is the way to go, but for people like me, who have no intention of performing live, software is best.
I want to make scores and soundtrack music. There's no reason to go live. For live music, it's just me, my acoustic, and a mic.
[offline]   Quote  
Old 11-22-2002, 10:38 PM   #4
heroesforghosts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: oregon
My guess is they don't know how to use real gear,or can't afford it.
[offline]   Quote  
Old 11-23-2002, 03:02 AM   #5
Forte
Blue... .
 
Forte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South FLA
That's bull.
What advantages do hardware have over software (other than going live). If you have a PC or Mac as your dedicated DAW, then there's no reason to use hardware (other than a MIDI keyboard, mics, and maybe a mixer as a preamp) because the computer is your hardware. Hardware synths, sequencers, and samplers, are just, smaller, dedicated computers that have annoying tiny LCD screens.

Of course, we're not talking about things like Magix Music Maker or something like that - we're talking about pro quality sequencers like Cubase that, in my opinion, are far better than any hardware sequencer.
[offline]   Quote  
Old 11-23-2002, 03:21 PM   #6
panbient
there is only one take
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: canada
i think it all comes down to wether or not you want to twiddle the knobs and hit the buttons for real or click and slide the mouse around...
__________________
i'm mr dave... i don't use avatars ever...

http://www.myspace.com/wallofpanda
[offline]   Quote  
Old 12-24-2002, 12:53 PM   #7
effectivenow
Registered User
 
effectivenow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montreal Canada
It's a very simple question! Your capabilities are far MORE superior with software! I use both!

Effective Now
[offline]   Quote  




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search






Page generated in 0.21401 seconds with 51 queries [Server Loads: 0.15 : 0.05 : 0.06]