Michael Jackson - Page 10

(e) · 11-08-2003, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NiftyGibbon
I don't think you understood her. MJ and Mozart are from different genres of music.

Mozart is classical, MJ is pop/rock. So it's a bit silly to compare them when people have different tastes in music genres. It's just down to taste.

I know that Mozart is a true legend, but in my opinion MJ is also- I prefer MJ cos I prefer his TYPE of music.

I know what she said...I actually quoted it.

(e) · 11-08-2003, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NiftyGibbon
Well when did CuriousOne ever say the thought that MJ was the VERY best of ALL music?

What's that have to do with what I said? You must have a pretty good imagination because I didn't even comment on what you are talking about.

(e) · 11-08-2003, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NiftyGibbon
Did you even read the previous post:

Thats the "theory" I was talking about.

Yes I did read the previous post. You obviously must have a hard time putting two and two together.

joseph · 11-08-2003, 03:14 AM

(e) instead of making
like 100 long posts why cant u just put it in one??
It takes up less room otherwise and we dont have to
scroll down so far when ignoring your post.

panbient · 11-08-2003, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by joseph
(e) instead of making
like 100 long posts why cant u just put it in one??
It takes up less room otherwise and we dont have to
scroll down so far when ignoring your post.

wow... talk about the pot calling the kettle black... at least (e) is adding something to the discussion...

and i'd call curious one's behavior towards MJ that of a normal fan...

anyway we're getting off track on the discussion... i've stated my opinion on jackson and i think i've offered more than enough information backing my views... never thought i'd talk about eastern philosophy while discussing him though...hehehe

joseph · 11-08-2003, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by panbient
wow... talk about the pot calling the kettle black... at least (e) is adding something to the discussion...

yeh 6658 of them...

NiftyGibbon · 11-08-2003, 05:49 AM

I don't know what you mean joseph. It is easier to quote stuff in loads of post and takes up less time.

panbient, CuriousOne isn't a fan... i think.
(e), what you said about the Slipknot thing- I was wrong and I'm sorry.

(e) · 11-08-2003, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by joseph
(e) instead of making
like 100 long posts why cant u just put it in one??
It takes up less room otherwise and we dont have to
scroll down so far when ignoring your post.

Like what NiftyGibbon said, it's much quicker to do what I have been doing. (Quoting individually)

Now lets see...you have 5 posts...all of them are crap and pointless. If you don't like it here, nobody is saying you have to stay.

And yes, I do have a lot of posts but the vast majority of them have something to do with the topic or are helping someone out. So far you haven't done any of that...all 5 of your posts have been telling someone something stupid.

NiftyGibbon · 11-08-2003, 11:42 AM

Don't worry, I know joseph from another forum. He's a bit of a trouble maker if you ask me, not that I would know about trouble makers or anything. lol :tongue:

tanjello · 11-10-2003, 09:57 AM

Jacko is a freak anybody who doesn't recognise that must have their head up their own ass.
Whether or not he is a child molester, well who knows really, (except for the poor kids if he is). I'll tell you one thing, I would not let my two year old anywhere near him.

He was ahead of his time in the mid eighties and he can dance like a champ but he really is past his prime. I think his work in the 80's was so ground brakeing that it has carried his populatity for much longer than it should have. If he was a band he would have broken up a long time ago. I don't think he has much more to add to the music world, everything he seems to have done in the last 10 years seems to be rehashed tripe that I find just a tad boring.