what you guys think about Michael Jackson - Page 3

NiftyGibbon · 11-04-2003, 03:33 PM

Quote Sammo

Quote:

that is not his new music. like (e) said it was years ago. its newer than the jackson 5, in the same way that the mammoth was newer than t-rex.

Like I said, someone said that the albums after Bad were crap, I clearly noted this in a previous post.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are such people as Michael Jackson fans, and they are fans because they know MJ for who he really is.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

wrong. they are fans for his music. his fans won't know him intimately in the same way his critis won't.

How do you know? Are you a fan? Looking at your previous post it is clear that you aren't. But, you must be a fan of some pop stars, do you know all about them, what they do and how they inspire you. This is also why MJ fans like him, not just mainly for his amazing music and talent.

But I respect you for your opinions, unlike someone else who just spitefully give out second hand replys with no meaning.

NiftyGibbon · 11-04-2003, 03:42 PM

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am a fan of Michael so of course I know whether he is a kind person, I know all about him. Yes he is eccentric, and yes he has had plastic surgery. But I bet you would like him more if he kept his face as normal wouldn't you. But no, just because it's Michael Jackson the wacko, you have to go along with what everyone else says.

Pitiful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

is anyone actually saying THAT??? I haven't read anything on the last few pages that attacks his character at all ...

I mean the public not all the people on here. Why is there nobody else here defending the man, all he wants to do is entertain the public with his great music and talent, not entertain the public with bizarrse made-up stories by the press.

Quote:

and the earnings from the dangerous show... were those profits that went to charity? or was it a legal obligation due to missed performances where he wouldn't have to pay a fine if he donated the cash...

having said all this i still like michael jackson's music... at least when he was a black man... the hermaphrodite alien doesn't do much for me... maybe it should try working with marilyn manson... some sort of super androgynous media pop rock freak out...

He gave all of the money to charity from one concert because he is a kind person, not a wacko. See him on the Bashir interview, he is a kind person. The program he released defending his side wasn't edited or produced by him, Michael just supplied them with the footage.

Quote:

the hermaphrodite alien doesn't do much for me...

Would you like it if someone called YOU that? I doubt it...

Sammo · 11-04-2003, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Like I said, someone said that the albums after Bad were crap, I clearly noted this in a previous post.

so? that still isn't his new music ...

Quote:

How do you know? Are you a fan? Looking at your previous post it is clear that you aren't. But, you must be a fan of some pop stars, do you know all about them, what they do and how they inspire you. This is also why MJ fans like him, not just mainly for his amazing music and talent.

I can say that because generally big superstars do not meet every single one of their fans, therefore everyone of his/hers fans will not know what that person is actually like. I AM a fan as I've said, so you've obviously not read my posts.

Quote:

But I respect you for your opinions, unlike someone else who just spitefully give out second hand replys with no meaning.

Thankyou, I'm glad you respect my opinion killian. But (e) is not the person here who is giving out second-hand replies ...

Sammo · 11-04-2003, 03:48 PM

[quote]I am a fan of Michael so of course I know whether he is a kind person, I know all about him. Yes he is eccentric, and yes he has had plastic surgery. But I bet you would like him more if he kept his face as normal wouldn't you. But no, just because it's Michael Jackson the wacko, you have to go along with what everyone else says.[quote]Exactly how do you know all about him? And don't pretend you've met him. You've read your information on him the same way I have. It wouldn't bother me if he had no plastic surgery at all or if he changed his sex, what he wants to do to his body if up to him.

Quote:

I mean the public not all the people on here. Why is there nobody else here defending the man, all he wants to do is entertain the public with his great music and talent, not entertain the public with bizarrse made-up stories by the press.

I was talking about the public. I am defending him if you'd notice.

Quote:

He gave all of the money to charity from one concert because he is a kind person, not a wacko. See him on the Bashir interview, he is a kind person. The program he released defending his side wasn't edited or produced by him, Michael just supplied them with the footage.

The two are not mutually exclusive I'm sure.

Quote:

Would you like it if someone called YOU that? I doubt it...

Probably not, but I'm not calling him a wacko.

Sammo · 11-04-2003, 03:51 PM

Quote:

in terms of the slanted view from the media... didn't jackson produce his own tv special not too long ago to show things from his point of view... and didn't it turn out to be even creepier than the mass media version?

It didn't make him seem any better, it just make david bashir look lik a jerk

NiftyGibbon · 11-04-2003, 03:53 PM

Quote:

so? that still isn't his new music ...

Ok. But may I tell you that Michael has only released 2 songs over the past 8 years because of the following: the public don't seem to care for him, Sony rejected him, and he has children now. So how can you judge all this "new music" talk when he's only released one 2 songs, which I must say one of them was amazing (You Rock My World).

Quote:

I can say that because generally big superstars do not meet every single one of their fans, therefore everyone of his/hers fans will not know what that person is actually like. I AM a fan as I've said, so you've obviously not read my posts.

That is true, but I do know someone who has met him and knows him as a completely normal person.
I am sorry for judging you as not a fan, but all other fans I know would agree with what I am stating right now.

Quote:

Thankyou, I'm glad you respect my opinion killian. But (e) is not the person here who is giving out second-hand replies ...

Who said I was talking about (e)? lol kidding.

I appologise to (e), I did over-react a bit, but saying "F*ck you" to someone isn't the nicest thing I've heard here.

NiftyGibbon · 11-04-2003, 03:55 PM

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Would you like it if someone called YOU that? I doubt it...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

Probably not, but I'm not calling him a wacko.

I was quoting panbient...

Sammo · 11-04-2003, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Ok. But may I tell you that Michael has only released 2 songs over the past 8 years because of the following: the public don't seem to care for him, Sony rejected him, and he has children now. So how can you judge all this "new music" talk when he's only released one 2 songs, which I must say one of them was amazing (You Rock My World).

So? It's still old.

Sammo · 11-04-2003, 03:58 PM

Quote:

I am sorry for judging you as not a fan, but all other fans I know would agree with what I am stating right now.

Not necessarily, I don't think I need to tell you why because you've just disagreed with TWO fans.

NiftyGibbon · 11-04-2003, 04:04 PM

Because I am new here and I don't have the psychic ability to automatically know who is a fan and who isn't.