Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Satchmo8101
And as you know it's a language of numbers, which is controlled by the left hemisphere of the brain.
|
see this is where i'll agree to disagree. i don't see why one side has to dominate the other. i won't deny that we're essentially a giant 1 or 0. but i like to believe that music in it's purest form can exist without needing to be controlled by the numbers. it's basically the difference between consciously considering the harmony, melody, and rhythms as opposed to simply expressing them as they occur dynamically.
basically i really like how eric dolphy puts it at the end of
last date
"when you hear music, after it's over, it's gone in the air. you can never capture it again"
and basically the way i take that statement is similar to what i believe coltrane was trying to express on
interstellar space where the music becomes it's own entity free from the math that controls US. it's like they were both trying to reach a point where they didn't need to rely on the left side anymore and could open the right side all the way. to me that's what 'real' music is about.
i'm not denying the place of conventional music and how it encompasses both sides of the brain. it's just that for me it seems limiting to have to, in a sense, compromise one's vision in order to implement recognizable mathematic patters so that average listeners can more easily latch onto your music. basically i'd rather not have to rely on 3 mathematic concepts to support one artistic ideal.
maybe i'm being pretentious or maybe i'm just seriously not interested in having to follow the same path of having to compose tunes in order to be a 'serious' musician. funny how i get the impression out here in my local scene that i'm not a 'serious' musician since all i really want to do is play music instead of writing tunes and practicing set lists and playing shows...