i'm totally gonna go against satchmo on this one
i really thought the first tomahawk disc was meh. then again i heard
mit gas first. to me that 2nd disc sounds like a much more polished and solid album than the first one (but going chronologically it might seem like a rehash). but for myself i'd rank MG as one of the best rock releases in years.
for fantomas i'd say get
the director's cut to start, it's more accessible to the rest and will give you an easier transition into patton's general vocal style for that group. go with
suspended animation if your brave or already have a general idea of what to expect. hehe. actually, this is a bit from SA...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGlKflP7ycE (i had found a better one from the same show a while back with a bozzio solo but this one is still cool)
for SC3 i'd go with
Book M. BoH is also good but i prefer BM because the styles seem to be better blended than on the latest disc. it's basically a matter of whether or not you would rather have the styles mixed for the whole album or an album of various styles. the same goes for bungle,
disco volante is non-stop organized chaos from the get go while
california (my personal favorite) is more like a collection of songs from the various styles the band enjoys.
as for FNM while i really like
album of the year i won't deny that
angel dust is their best.
and peeping tom has one and a half decent tracks. the first song (5 seconds?) is halfway decent and the last one (we're not alone?) almost sounds like FNM. i wouldn't pay for PT though.