|
|
Hello, you are welcome to view the Radio Mute music forum as our guest.
If you wish to participate, you will have to register to become one of our members.
Radio Mute is an all inclusive music forum which strives to include every topic related to music.
If you choose to participate, new forums and features will open up to you;
including an option of having 3 songs uploaded and shown in your posts for free,
community section with general chat and more.
|
12-14-2004, 09:24 PM
|
#21
|
|
there is only one take
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: canada
|
jackson might have 1 or 2 albums left in him but since he hasn't released anything really good since 'thriller' back in 1982 i don't think it really matters anymore.
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
12-14-2004, 10:35 PM
|
#22
|
|
Sing Your Life
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: tor. ON, CAN
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by panbient
jackson might have 1 or 2 albums left in him but since he hasn't released anything really good since 'thriller' back in 1982 i don't think it really matters anymore.
|
thats not true. hes had at least two huge albums since Thriller- Bad and Dangerous. if yure into Michael Jackson, these are two albums you would at least consider to be "good".
__________________
"I'm just passing through here, on my way to somewhere civilized- and maybe I'll even arrive, maybe I'll even arrive..."
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
12-14-2004, 10:39 PM
|
#23
|
|
Sing Your Life
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: tor. ON, CAN
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by panbient
i don't think kylie minogue is old enough to have been around longer than michael jackson (he was what 8 when the jackson 5 started up?). and if she's been in the spotlight longer than madonna it's through being a child actor and not her singing career.
|
he wasnt sayin that Kylie has been around longer than Michael or Madonna- obviously she hasnt- juste that shes been around for ten years or longer. hes right too.
__________________
"I'm just passing through here, on my way to somewhere civilized- and maybe I'll even arrive, maybe I'll even arrive..."
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
12-25-2004, 05:54 AM
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
|
I guess Robbie Williams will still be around. And of course Madonna...but I guess she doesn't really count.
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
12-31-2004, 03:19 PM
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
|
i bet david bowie will do stuff and definetly morrissey
__________________
4 strings is all ya need! -Bassmasta Joe
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
01-27-2005, 07:32 PM
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
|
Beck will be around in 10 years.
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
01-28-2005, 05:03 AM
|
#27
|
|
Registered User
|
U2 might still be around.
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
01-28-2005, 04:39 PM
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: groveport, OH
|
pop encompasses more than just "pop" music, if you get my meaning. bands such as 'the beatles' were pop music. same with 'led zeppelin' which became pop music after their first album even though their actual genre was rock/blues, they became 'adopted' into pop music once they began selling a whole bunch of albums (like gold status on the first 6 i believe). rolling stones are pop music, david bowie as well. nick cave is slowly becoming pop music (who would have thought it?). and just being in pop music doesn't mean that the artist has 'sold-out' or gone too commercial or something. i mean 'the beatles' were blatantly pop, but they're one of the most important artists of the 20th century (and beyond).
people seem to have a strange view of what pop music really is. it's such a broad "genre" but it's not really a genre either. it's anything that is 'deemed commercial by the public and sells well'. so i would divide music in general into two categories: pop and experimental/avant-garde music, with all their various genres underneath that. so i wouldn't limit just michael jackson and madonna to the only 'pop gods'. where's john lennon? elton john? etc.
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
01-28-2005, 07:09 PM
|
#29
|
|
,,.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: beach
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aladdin_sane
pop encompasses more than just "pop" music, if you get my meaning. bands such as 'the beatles' were pop music. same with 'led zeppelin' which became pop music after their first album even though their actual genre was rock/blues, they became 'adopted' into pop music once they began selling a whole bunch of albums (like gold status on the first 6 i believe). rolling stones are pop music, david bowie as well. nick cave is slowly becoming pop music (who would have thought it?). and just being in pop music doesn't mean that the artist has 'sold-out' or gone too commercial or something. i mean 'the beatles' were blatantly pop, but they're one of the most important artists of the 20th century (and beyond).
people seem to have a strange view of what pop music really is. it's such a broad "genre" but it's not really a genre either. it's anything that is 'deemed commercial by the public and sells well'. so i would divide music in general into two categories: pop and experimental/avant-garde music, with all their various genres underneath that. so i wouldn't limit just michael jackson and madonna to the only 'pop gods'. where's john lennon? elton john? etc.
|
agreed agreed agreed
__________________
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
|
01-29-2005, 02:44 AM
|
#30
|
|
Registered User
|
BTW...how old is Elton John? Will he be around in 10 years?
|
|
[offline]
|
Quote
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.5.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.
|
|
Page generated in 0.28847 seconds with 54 queries [Server Loads: 0.12 : 0.17 : 0.18]
|
|
