This argument is something I fought against not so long ago but it worries me now..
I love IDM and like an errant child when I hear album after album of the same old shit coming out I want to grab it and smack its bottom shouting "NO NO NO" for it's own good.
How many times can we hear a Tri Repartae clone before it drives us mad or another Vsnares album or clone.
It's starting to go like EBM where you can hardly tell the difference between one band and another and there's so much of a saturation out there I could spend years catching up with all the acts I haven't heard and still not have the time to give them justice.
Point 1: In a partially experimental genre multiple albums should not sound the same.
So why do they?
When I was writing my album there were points where I thought.. should I put this in? Won't it alienate me from the IDM genre? and I realised then just how insular the genre was which is precisely why when I had that feeling of should I put it in I would make a POINT of putting it in.
I hope that musicians start to realise that just because they cleverly made a grinding noise out of a fish farting it doesn't make their track good, it takes more than that.
Anyway.... rant over.


